Honey Singh and the Totalising Project

Asgar Qadri is a graduate student at the Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver, Colorado, USA.

Asgar Qadri

One of the fundamental problems with modern nation-state is that by its very creation and claim of being the only possible form of political community it seeks and imposes exclusion on those who don’t belong to its territorial jurisdiction. With its creation boundaries were drawn, ‘us’ and ‘them’ were created, denying those who lay outside the boundary an equal space in the moral conversations. Its creation was also the beginning of dominance of powerful over those who were considered weak. This is largely what Marx called the “totalising project” of the modern state.

This might seem an odd way to begin writing about something which is of concern here: Honey Singh and his song titled “Ch@#t.” Those who understand Hindi know that the term is extremely derogatory and condescending to women. What is more shocking is the fact that there exists music by this name which is heard and celebrated. The reason I began writing about this with something that is seemingly unrelated is because I see this kind of art, if at all it can be called art, as a part of the totalising project of man over woman in our societies. The only thing I had to change in my mind was to change the idea of state with individual, the man.

When a friend brought this to my notice I was appalled not only about the language used in the song but at the fact that abuse against women is celebrated through music, directed at young adolescent men who then begin to romanticise such abuse, and begin to consider it a source of their male power to be directed against women. After listening to the song, I began to think about the possible sources of such acts of abuse in a society, about the source of courage of a person who creates and celebrates such disrespect toward women.

The search for answer took me to the idea of totalising project. Even though man’s attempt to dominate over woman is blatantly apparent in our basic day to day social relations but seeking this dominance through language, language that is far reaching in terms of music is a masked aspect of this quest dominance. I could easily see the connection between language and power in this song. It is that patriarchal dominance that certain societies and men represent, which is the source of such abuse and courage. It is part of the totalising project that seeks to perpetuate patriarchy and dominance of man. This kind of music facilitates the process of othering, the creation of us and them; that men are superior who can direct and control such abusive music with freedom and women on the receiving end are inferior. This is part of the quest for exclusion that is inherent in patriarchy and on which it sustains.

This kind of language and music therefore facilitates this totalising project. Young men are told to celebrate condescension for women and render them to a reduced form of being. There has to be something fundamentally and terribly flawed in a social organization wherein such level of verbal abuse against women gets not only tolerated but accepted and celebrated. The question therefore becomes, how is this being allowed, how such a social condition happens to be possible where this is possible? I raise this question for the reader because I think it is only with such questions that we can understand how we came to be where we are now and is there a possibility of alternative society, with alternative men, where women are equals and any possibility of abuse toward them is eliminated. Answers to this question might be deeply historical and social, one might need to look at the genealogy to understand where and how such narratives became socially dominant in history; but all this must begin with protesting against, militantly critiquing, and rejecting attempts that consolidate this dominance and abuse in the contemporary. Honey Singh’s music belongs to a series of such attempts that we need to turn off.

Protesting against such music is also important in the larger context of violence against women and rapes that happen in and around Delhi almost every day; whether we want to raise our voice against this menace or be voyeuristic as we have been so far. Music like “Ch@#t” is dangerous and violent not only because it teaches young men to degrade women but it also encourages them to translate the degradation into practical violence. It is important that this kind of violent art is stopped and not to confuse that with blocking the freedom of expression; all freedoms, after all, should be meant to create a just society.

As a man I am ashamed and at the same time enraged that there are men who are part of such a project, who forget that by disrespecting women they denigrate themselves, because no man is an island, we are all born to our mothers.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Honey Singh and the Totalising Project

  1. I run an organization called Hollaback! Chandigarh which works to fight against street harassment and other forms of gender based violence and one of our struggles is dealing with the effect that punjabi songs have on gender based violence. Many of them, particularly Honey Singh songs, blatantly promote violence against women and sexual harassment.

    I live in Punjab (Chandigarh) and I’ve seen honey singh becoming this complete phenomenon here and it constantly saddens me and angers me at the same time. I’ve grown up in Punjab and I really love punjabi music and i like the ‘cleaner’ songs that honey singh comes up with but this is something that really needed to be said. His songs are promoting violence and misogyny and young men are getting wrongly influenced. I even know a lot of women who are incredibly fond of his music and know the lyrics by heart. Good beats are not an excuse to promote degradation of women.

  2. I was planning to write exactly this a week ago.
    Well put article.!
    I’d love to add another such case. The song ‘Angreji beat’ by Honey Singh says ‘ka tu ini desperate sannu das de ki hai rate’.
    Despite such derogatory lyrics this song is being celebrated in an upcoming film Cocktail. After that ,totalisation can’t be curbed very easily can it??

  3. Agree with you on this.. unfortunately we live in a circle where songs are increasingly violent.. take for instance the new rage I am a hunter.. or the shocking rap bits about forcing oneself on a woman in the chorus of Bachna ai haseeno [the new ranbir kapur one] .. which i was shocked to discover. What is further interesting is how men and women create music differently.. so the same song.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iiQmg8Sldu8 which when sung by a man reminiscing about old times invariably talks about the fun he and his friends had harassing women.. and when re-created by women becomes a much more fun and empowering articulation of women’s freedom [with a message against sex selective abortions as well :)] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5KZpVpqKiw&feature=related
    .. Makes me wonder how differently we raise our boys and girls.. :! and why!

  4. i live in a small town in Haryana, and here I have seen boys teasing girls by singing such vulgar songs. Sadly enough, our society has accepted this. Honey Singh should feel guilty.

  5. As the world knows in Haryana all the real hard work is done by women and the men sit around playing cards. Even drone bees work to eat but these losers are the pits.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s